<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unicode Attribute - Necessary before Unicode Conversion? in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836966#M1472501</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are about to upgrade to ECC 6.0 with a Unicode conversion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that the "Unicode Checks Active" flag must be set in every&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;customer program in order for the code to run in an ECC 6.0 unicode environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is does this HAVE to be done before we do the unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conversion. What we would like to do is convert the system to ECC 6.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with Unicode and then apply the transports which set the "Unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Checks Active" flag. Since some of these transports contain new&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;objects, we would prefer to upgrade to ECC 6.0, then convert to unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;first and apply the transports afterwards, to reduce the risk of potentially needing to rerun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;scans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally we would have cleared all this before the upgrade, but we only&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;found this issue in our test system after we had upgraded it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a bad plan?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-31T07:54:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unicode Attribute - Necessary before Unicode Conversion?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836966#M1472501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are about to upgrade to ECC 6.0 with a Unicode conversion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that the "Unicode Checks Active" flag must be set in every&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;customer program in order for the code to run in an ECC 6.0 unicode environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is does this HAVE to be done before we do the unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conversion. What we would like to do is convert the system to ECC 6.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with Unicode and then apply the transports which set the "Unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Checks Active" flag. Since some of these transports contain new&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;objects, we would prefer to upgrade to ECC 6.0, then convert to unicode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;first and apply the transports afterwards, to reduce the risk of potentially needing to rerun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;scans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally we would have cleared all this before the upgrade, but we only&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;found this issue in our test system after we had upgraded it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a bad plan?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836966#M1472501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-31T07:54:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unicode Attribute - Necessary before Unicode Conversion?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836967#M1472502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is not necessary to set the Unicode flag for programming objects in order to succeed with the technical Unicode conversion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However please keep in mind that the programs without flag will not work in the Unicode environment (as you already stated).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nils Buerckel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP AG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836967#M1472502</guid>
      <dc:creator>nils_buerckel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-31T09:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unicode Attribute - Necessary before Unicode Conversion?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836968#M1472503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks Nils.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-attribute-necessary-before-unicode-conversion/m-p/6836968#M1472503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-01T07:51:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

