topic Re: Post Upgrade issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:32:09 GMT

Hello Gurus,

we are upgarding SAP from 4.6c to ECC 6.0.

As a part of post upgarde activities , i am executing SU25 2(B)-(D) steps.

While analysing SU25 2(b) step, i had found that few authorization objects which are checked in 46c version and not found in SU24 proposal in new version.

For example:

for transaction CG02 , in 46c sU24 proposal authorization objects C_SHEP_TPP is check/maintain, whereas in ECC version this authorization object doesnot appear in the SU24 proposal of CG02 transaction.

Also there are few objects which are check maintain in R3 version and Do not check in the new version for the same transaction.

How should i get the same SU24 values in ECC version as in R/3 version ?

This is my first upgrade project, iam very much confused with these inconssitencies, any help is very much appreciated.

Thanks,

Sanketh.

Re: Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:44:07 GMT

Double-click the object or take a look at it in transaction SU21. It is obsolete and has been replaced.

That is what SU25 is trying to tell you.

Cheers,

Julius

Re: Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:01:44 GMT

addind few more to Julius.. Please check for tcodes which are missing now there should be few.

Thanks,

Prasant K Paichha

Re: Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:10:04 GMT

Thanks Julius for the Quick reply.

I had check in Su21, only few objects were obselete and remaining objects are active.

for ex:

transaction :CG02 suthorization object S_IMG_ACTV is check in R3 and is not present in SU24 proposal of ECC version.

I had checked this object in SU21 it is not obselete.

Can you please clarify on this.

Thanks,

Sanketh.

Re: Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:19:35 GMT

Yep, you need to go through them and make decisions.

Example questions

Does CG02 have anything to do with IMG activities?

Should it by default propose authorizations for IMG activities?

Example answers

No.

Cheers,

Julius

Re: Post Upgrade issue

Former Member — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:43:02 GMT

I have found all such type of Conflicting tcodes and sent for client approval.

Meanwhile, iam doing Su25 2(B) for remianing transactions, i had a doubt here the SAP defaults for R/3 are not the same as in the ECC version, Suppose for transaction /SAPSMOSS/QM12

Authorization objects PLOG ,PABAP,P_ORGXX,S_dataset,S_develop are maintained as check in R/3 whereas in ECC the SAP defaults for these objects are Check No.

Whether i should change the proposal to Check Yes in ECC version or maintain the SAP Defaults as it is in ECC version.

Will it affect to be any authorization issue, please clarify.

Thanks,

Sanketh.