topic Re: Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode? in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode?

Former Member — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:31:50 GMT

hello,

In Non-Unicode System. We can declare :

DATA: BEGIN OF wt_tab OCCURS 0,

field1(10),

field2 TYPE MENGE,

field3(10),

END OF wt_tab.

DATA: wl_char(100) .

MOVE wt_tab1115) TO wl_char11(15).

but in Unicode , We can not do this because the first 10 chars and then number. So is there's any function that allow us to assign the corresponding fields from structure into a string of characters.

Thanks

Re: Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode?

SuhaSaha — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:43:57 GMT

Hello,

In UC systems you cannot use offset on packed data.

Can you try:

wl_char+11(15) = wt_tab-field2.

BR,

SUhas

Re: Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode?

Former Member — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:56:47 GMT

Hello Suhas,

Thank you for your quick answer.

I mean here the offset in structure does not fall into a begining of a field in structure. so We can not get the field directly , This will be wrong data. The code is like

DATA: BEGIN OF wt_text occurs 0,

text(500),

end of wt_text.

DATA : BEGIN OF t_data OCCURS 0,

ebeln LIKE ekko-ebeln, " 1 - 10.

ebelp LIKE ekpo-ebelp, " 11 - 15

lifnr LIKE ekko-lifnr, " 16 - 25

bedat LIKE ekko-bedat, " 26 - 33

kdate LIKE ekko-kdate, " 34 - 41

waers LIKE ekko-waers, " 42 - 47

wkurs LIKE ekko-wkurs, "48 - 55

matnr LIKE ekpo-matnr, " 56 - 74

txz01 LIKE ekpo-txz01, " 75 - 115

matkl LIKE ekpo-matkl, " 116 - 125

pstyp LIKE ekpo-pstyp, " 126

knttp LIKE ekpo-knttp, " 127

end of wt-data.

MOVE wt_data50(70) TO wt_text-text58(69).

So here how I can replace this code in UNICODE.

Re: Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode?

SuhaSaha — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:08:54 GMT

Hello,

In that case i think you have to debug & check what exactly is being done in that offsetting operation.

BR,

Suhas

Re: Assign a structure fields to a String in Unicode?

rainer_hbenthal — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:04:15 GMT

Handling structures as strings was always dirty programming style. For what reason do you need that?