topic Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

Former Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:08:15 GMT

Hi SAP Gurus,

We are facing a weird issue in which the same authorization check is successful in 1 transaction but failing in other transaction.

AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'B_USERSTAT'

ID 'STSMA' FIELD ISTSMA

ID 'OBTYP' FIELD IOBTYP

ID 'BERSL' DUMMY

ID 'ACTVT' FIELD LD_ACTVT.

The above check with values (STSMA = EHS_IAL1, OBTYP = IAL and ACTVT =01) is running successful through 1 transaction but failing in other.

Could you please suggest what is the possibility? Is there any mapping that exists between transaction code and auth object?

Your help in this regard is highly appreciated.

Regards

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

jurjen_heeck — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:26:48 GMT

In which way did you establish this failure? Su53? Systemtrace? Anything else?

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

Former Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:31:21 GMT

I found it through debugging and through SU53 also.

For transaction A sy-subrc is 0 and for transaction B it is 4.

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

jurjen_heeck — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:42:09 GMT

Maybe you can run a trace (ST01), try both transactions and post the trace results? So far, I'm in the dark....

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

Former Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:06:48 GMT

> Total Questions: 7 (7 unresolved)

There are five possible reasons, but I can only remember the first one so far...

B_USERSTAT is not a "basis" or "HR" object, so for specific transaction contexts the check indicator can be set to "No check" in SU24.

Try that and please follow up on your questions. I already deleted two duplicates.

Cheers,

Julius

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

Former Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:08:27 GMT

Thanks Julius. Through SU24 issue has been solved.

Re: Authorization Object B_USERSTAT

Former Member — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:24:06 GMT

Darn - I was looking forward to explaining the other four...

Thanks for following up on your questions. Note that the "comment" field is not mandatory and posting how you solved the problem is only optional, but good practice.

Cheers,

Julius