<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Concurrent access in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596661#M1436736</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to lock many entries at the same times ? with a widlcard caracter for instance ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-25T11:16:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596656#M1436731</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created a BAPI which is working well. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if I call it more than one times at the same times through RFC (php call), it doesn't work correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone help me about concurrent access like this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Smoltok&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596656#M1436731</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T08:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596657#M1436732</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore, a solution would be to have the possibility to make some sort of lock access... but how ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596657#M1436732</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T09:10:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596658#M1436733</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is your BAPI updating some table ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if so use lock object, consurrent read will not give any error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bikas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596658#M1436733</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T09:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596659#M1436734</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly, my BAPI update some table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have just created and activated one lock object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you have example of how to use the enqueue/dequeue system ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596659#M1436734</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T09:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596660#M1436735</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before the call to your BAPI, call the function module ENQUEUE_&amp;lt;name of the lock object&amp;gt; and pass the parameters to locjk the specific entry. Now all your BAPI amd once done unlock the entry by call the function module DEQUEUE_&amp;lt;name of the lock object&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:44:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596660#M1436735</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T09:44:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596661#M1436736</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to lock many entries at the same times ? with a widlcard caracter for instance ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596661#M1436736</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T11:16:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concurrent access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596662#M1436737</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, and you don't need to create another (custom) lock object.  You can use ENQUEUE_E_TABLE and specify the table name as well as the full or partial key (in the VARKEY field) in order to lock the records and then DEQUEUE_E_TABLE or DEQUEUE_ALL to release the lock(s).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/concurrent-access/m-p/6596662#M1436737</guid>
      <dc:creator>brad_bohn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T15:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

