topic Re: statement in Application Development and Automation Discussions

statement

Former Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:11:25 GMT

Please use a more meaningful subject in future

Hi all,

After we have upgraded the system from 4.6C to ECC 6.0, i found that lot of programs gives syntax error.

Could anyone explain me the reason for the following error?.

"Statement is not accessible" error in "Set titlebar ....." statment.

Regards,

Shanthi

Edited by: Matt on Dec 18, 2009 8:53 AM

Re: statement

Former Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:13:02 GMT

Please use a meaningful subject line

Re: statement

Former Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:13:15 GMT

Check with set-pf status commands in the report using transaction code SE41.

Regards

Srilaxmi

Re: statement

Former Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:13:31 GMT

Hi,

Ecc 6.0 does not suport this statemetn "set title...", check for the relavant syntax.

regards,

Nazeer

Re: statement

kesavadas_thekkillath — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:18:22 GMT

Hi Nazeer how do you say that it doesnt support ?

Re: statement

former_member206377 — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:22:19 GMT

Hi Shanti,

This error occurs usually when the control does not reach a particular statement. There may be a jump statement before this that doesn't allow the control to reach the statement.In such a case you can comment this line.

Regards,

Vasuki

Re: statement

Former Member — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:26:11 GMT

HI,

The program works correctly in 4.6C system, but not in ECC 6.0.

Re: statement

former_member206377 — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:34:23 GMT

Hi Shanti,

Yes, in ECC such statements cause error . It can b commented..

Re: statement

former_member206377 — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:19:32 GMT

It can be commented because anyway the statement is not executed. I guess you are getting an EPC error and not syntax error. EVen if it is syntax error, commenting it will not make any difference to the code.

That is the procedure followed in Upgrade if this error is in your project scope. If it is not in scope it can be ignored.

Re: statement

matt — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:53:47 GMT

Please use a more meaningful subject in future