<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issue with authorization objects in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495722#M1420962</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is standard behaviour. SAP doesn't consider the one transaction you've added but re-evaluates the whole menu for the role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jurjen_heeck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-14T14:49:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495720#M1420960</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are running on ECC 6 . There is an issue while adding t-codes to a role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we add a transaction code in the Menu tab, for eg, a Z transaction code, it throws up a whole lot of open authorization objects under the authorization tab (open authorizations under FI, MM, so on). The open values proposed are all the default values in SU24. This happens even if we use the 'Read old status and merge with the new'. Our check indicator maintenance for all t-codes seem to be fine. Pls advise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495720#M1420960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T14:44:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495721#M1420961</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So where is the question?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:49:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495721#M1420961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T14:49:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495722#M1420962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is standard behaviour. SAP doesn't consider the one transaction you've added but re-evaluates the whole menu for the role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495722#M1420962</guid>
      <dc:creator>jurjen_heeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T14:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495723#M1420963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; So where is the question?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guessed at "pls advise." &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495723#M1420963</guid>
      <dc:creator>jurjen_heeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T14:50:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495724#M1420964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We should offer a multiple-choice checkbox option for questions like this.. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still don't get it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495724#M1420964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T15:29:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495725#M1420965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks to me Yellow trafic light problem where the security administrators have changed the Standard Auth object to CHANGED by modifying it directly instead of :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Making a copy of Standard Auth object&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Making the standard Auth object inactive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. And then doing the change in the copy of that standard Auth object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495725#M1420965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T16:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495726#M1420966</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My apologies !! My question is why is it that by adding a 'Z' transaction code does it throw open authorization objects unrelated to it. I did a little research. Pls see my findings below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Julius suggested, this is a normal behaviour where the entire t-codes added are evaluated and the relelvant authorization objects are asked to maintain. The default values (SU24 values) are once again populated if they were not maintained during the earlier maintenance. Pls correct me if I am wrong. Thanks very much for your time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:04:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495726#M1420966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T16:04:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495727#M1420967</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; The default values (SU24 values) are once again populated if they were not maintained during the earlier maintenance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are populated again if they were &lt;STRONG&gt;deleted&lt;/STRONG&gt; during the earlier maintenance or are in a changed status of the original authorization where new values in SU24 are proposing something different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is why you should never delete standard or maintained authorizations and try to avoid the copy &amp;amp; change strategy by maintaining SU24 to meet your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It shounds like SU24 is not as "fine" as you have stated before hand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495727#M1420967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T16:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with authorization objects</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495728#M1420968</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Julius !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/issue-with-authorization-objects/m-p/6495728#M1420968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-18T15:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

