<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: append to standard table in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/append-to-standard-table/m-p/6312963#M1393025</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see no problem with your approach only pay attention with the following :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1/&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure you use unique field names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example start all your field names with ZZ and make sure you don't use SAP fieldnames.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is important to avoid duplicate field names in future SAP releases for the table where you would like to add fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Duplicate field names will result in problems during patching of the system and can cause eventual data loss when handled incorrectly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2/&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pay attention when future support packs, upgrades, enhancement packages, ... are installed in your system that there is a change that the table you are going to append will appear in the SPDD list because SAP provides a new version of the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is then up to the basis team to handle this SPDD correctly and re-implement the append structure to prevent data loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the only side effect that I see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wim Van den Wyngaert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-01T18:52:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>append to standard table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/append-to-standard-table/m-p/6312962#M1393024</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to maintain BW related classification in R3 standard table. For example , I would like to add couple of columns to material type table (T134) and populate it with values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to ask you the following questions :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you think its a right approach? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the down side of this approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to populate these values as table looks not open for modify &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/append-to-standard-table/m-p/6312962#M1393024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01T18:26:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: append to standard table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/append-to-standard-table/m-p/6312963#M1393025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see no problem with your approach only pay attention with the following :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1/&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure you use unique field names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example start all your field names with ZZ and make sure you don't use SAP fieldnames.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is important to avoid duplicate field names in future SAP releases for the table where you would like to add fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Duplicate field names will result in problems during patching of the system and can cause eventual data loss when handled incorrectly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2/&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pay attention when future support packs, upgrades, enhancement packages, ... are installed in your system that there is a change that the table you are going to append will appear in the SPDD list because SAP provides a new version of the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is then up to the basis team to handle this SPDD correctly and re-implement the append structure to prevent data loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the only side effect that I see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wim Van den Wyngaert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/append-to-standard-table/m-p/6312963#M1393025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01T18:52:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

