<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about destination parameter in RFC function module in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280205#M1388119</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont think it should effect the performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>former_member156446</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-11T17:56:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about destination parameter in RFC function module</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280204#M1388118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For execution of RFC function module such as MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API  on local server, the destination parameter is not required or it can be DESTINATION 'NONE'. I observe that the second option is much slower than the first option. My question is why the second is much slower.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hung&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280204#M1388118</guid>
      <dc:creator>hnguyen_kinaxis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T17:55:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about destination parameter in RFC function module</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280205#M1388119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont think it should effect the performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280205#M1388119</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member156446</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T17:56:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about destination parameter in RFC function module</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280206#M1388120</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tested it with se37 by leaving RFC target system blank or filling it with 'NONE' , I saw 53000 microseconds versus 45000 microseconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hung&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/question-about-destination-parameter-in-rfc-function-module/m-p/6280206#M1388120</guid>
      <dc:creator>hnguyen_kinaxis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T18:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

