<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Corresponding Statement in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117109#M1363219</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI, I would suggest to use the existing program logic to move the similar fields from one internal table to other, rather than writing seperate logic for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try to understand the existing logic , you will be able to reduce unnecessary statements for move.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:34:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Corresponding Statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117105#M1363215</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hv two  internal table i_Bseg and i_faglflexa. And both contains some common fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I want to append i_faglflexa table with i_bseg fields which is common in both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can i do this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;shall my loop look something like this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;loop at i_bseg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   append corresponding i_bseg to i_faglflexa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endloop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need ur suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maverick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;you could have solved it on your own with a little more effort&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Suresh Datti on Sep 2, 2009 11:55 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117105#M1363215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:25:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corresponding Statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117106#M1363216</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try like this,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;

loop at i_bseg.
move-corresponding i_bseg to i_faglflexa.
append i_faglflexa.
clear i_faglflexa.
endloop.

&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vikranth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117106#M1363216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:29:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corresponding Statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117107#M1363217</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep both table fields in same order then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
append lines of i_bseg into i_faglflexa.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then no need of loop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a®&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117107#M1363217</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member194669</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:31:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corresponding Statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117108#M1363218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;loop at i_bseg into wa_bseg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;move-corresponding wa_bseg to wa_faglflexa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;append wa_faglflexa to i_falflexa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;clear:  wa_faglflexa, wa_bseg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endloop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117108#M1363218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corresponding Statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117109#M1363219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI, I would suggest to use the existing program logic to move the similar fields from one internal table to other, rather than writing seperate logic for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try to understand the existing logic , you will be able to reduce unnecessary statements for move.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/corresponding-statement/m-p/6117109#M1363219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T04:34:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

