<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NRIV table locking in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217285#M135236</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NRIV table locking &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Posted: Apr 18, 2006 9:28 AM        Reply      E-mail this post  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This question is related to the NRIV locking that happens during idoc processing (post FI documents).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Who can clarify if the locking happens at the table level or if the locking happens at the record level based on object(its RF_BELEG in our case), 'sub object', 'no range' and 'ToYear'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Poorna&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-04-21T10:01:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NRIV table locking</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217285#M135236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NRIV table locking &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Posted: Apr 18, 2006 9:28 AM        Reply      E-mail this post  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This question is related to the NRIV locking that happens during idoc processing (post FI documents).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Who can clarify if the locking happens at the table level or if the locking happens at the record level based on object(its RF_BELEG in our case), 'sub object', 'no range' and 'ToYear'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Poorna&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217285#M135236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-21T10:01:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NRIV table locking</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217286#M135237</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the lock is at SUBOBJECT level, because it defines the range has to be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The range depends on the document type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can have several document types related to several ranges, but all this ranges belong to the same type range (OBJECT): RV_BELEG.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it can't simultaneously  post documents use the same range (so the SUBOBJECT).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217286#M135237</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-21T10:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NRIV table locking</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217287#M135238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Poorna,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the idoc processing, it should lock at record level (object, subobject and number range number).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check this lock object EBKK_NUMRG in t/code SE11 and use this FM to lock and unlock.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;ENQUEUE_EBKK_NUMRG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DEQUEUE_EBKK_NUMRG&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For configuration, it should lock at object level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check this lock object ESNRIV in SE11 and use this FM to lock and unlock.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;ENQUEUE_ESNRIV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DEQUEUE_ESNRIV&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this will help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ferry Lianto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/nriv-table-locking/m-p/1217287#M135238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-21T11:23:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

