topic Re: IDOC setup in Application Development and Automation Discussions

IDOC setup

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:45:23 GMT

Dear experts,

I am facing an isue with IDOC setup.

I have a standard Message type and an IDOC type (Basic type).

After doing all the necessary stups, I am unable to see in the IDOC the link between the Basic type and the Message type I assigned WE82, WE57 and also BD60. I want to use the structure of the Basic type which is standard and see also that in the IDOC I have created. The system used a defaullt COND_02 isntead WPDBBY01which is assigned to WPDBBY (mesage type) through the transactions I mentioned.

Why, at the time of IDOC processing system always picks up COND_02 which has nothing to do with the message type WPDBBY.

Thanks

Re: IDOC setup

venkateswarareddy_medam — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:27:51 GMT

Hi Andy,

Please check ur Partner profile.

Goto we20 select your logical system and Outbound parameters .

Here you can check your message type is assigned to your Idoc type .

Regards,

Venkat.

Re: IDOC setup

alex_m — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:18:12 GMT

If I am right, the idoc created with type COND_02 not with WPDBBY01 though you have setup the ALE config for message WPDBBY.

Check your partner profile(WE20) & distribution model(BD64) whats the message type you have mentined..

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:31:41 GMT

Hello,

the message type in WE20 outbound paramenter is WPDBBY LS and also BD64 is showing teh same message type WPDBBY and basic type WPDBBY01.

So I really dont know. The functional module or method is bland in BD60 as I dont know which I want I should use.

Waht I need is only to create an IDOC out with the côrrect structure as above.

Thanks

Re: IDOC setup

alex_m — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:40:42 GMT

Whats the FM you attched for the message in BD60?.. What data you need to send via Idoc?..

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:42:22 GMT

hello,

in BD60

WPDBBY WPDBBY MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_W_PDLD.

I am using this combo.

I can find a combination with the WPDBBY in the end..

Thanks

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:46:40 GMT

The data I need to send are conditions. VK12 Transactions Then I send the conditions via IDOC.

Also when I use in BD60 CODA as my ref. messge I am able to see the message type WPDBBY and when I remove the ref. message from BD60 and put WPDBBY instead I dont see this message type when I use VK12 display my condition and then send condition open the message window and it is gone.

I dont know what this ref. field means in BD60.

Thanks

Re: IDOC setup

alex_m — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:51:10 GMT

I think the problem with the FM, pls see the below article.

https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/1f09ac90-0201-0010-45b3-b58514ae6b1f

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:05 GMT

hello,

I dont see nay documentation with the message type WPDBBY in the link you sent me.

Do you know?

Re: IDOC setup

alex_m — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:00:05 GMT

If you want send condition records why don't you use the message type COND_A & idoc type COND_A03.. This can be send via change pointer..

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:52:35 GMT

the structure of Conda doesnt fit the Business requirement and we want to keep the process separated and therefore require

a new message type ..

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:06:07 GMT


> hello,
> I dont see nay documentation with the message type WPDBBY in the link you sent me.
> Do you know?

this is a complete .zip ... follow the link and click the button 'view article' -> the file will download then. i peeked into some of the files and i really think you should look at them closely -> it's for IS-Retail only, but you seem to have implemented this.

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:16:25 GMT

yes, I checked all but what I could like to tell you is that tos etup the IDOC I cannot find teh proper link...to the basic type and message type which is tottaly long...

Re: IDOC setup

Former Member — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:59:13 GMT