<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Validating 10 numeric fields - any better approach? in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990359#M1342407</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;or using field symbols&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
data: fieldname(11) type c value 'ITAB1-AMT',
         idx(2) type c.

field-symbls &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; type any.

loop at itab1.
   do 10 times.
      write sy-index to idx. "' 1', ' 2'...'10'
      condense idx. "'1', '2'...'10'
      concatenate fieldname idx into fieldname. "ITAB-AMT1, ITAB-AMT2 ...
       
      assign (fieldname) to &amp;lt;field&amp;gt;. "now &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; stores appropriate value
      if &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' or 
         &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' or
         &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA '~`!@#$%^&amp;amp;*()-_=+[{]}\|;:'",&amp;lt;.&amp;gt;/?'.
        write: / 'error'.
      endif.
   enddo.
endloop.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarcinPciak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-19T18:55:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Validating 10 numeric fields - any better approach?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990357#M1342405</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've an internal table with 15 fields. First 5 fields are all text fields and the next 10 fields are of type DMBTR. I have to validate each of these fields. Currently I've coded as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data: begin of itab1 occurs 0,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	text1	type	char4,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	text2  	type	char2,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	text3  	type char10,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	text4	type char6,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	text5	type	char4,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt1	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt2	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt3	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt4	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt5	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt6   	type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt7	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt8	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt9	        type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	amt10	type	dmbtr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      end of itab1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;perform some steps and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;collect data into itab1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;loop at itab1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if itab1-amt1 CA 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt1 CA 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt1 CA '~`!@#$%^&amp;amp;*()-_=+[{]}\|;:'",&amp;lt;.&amp;gt;/?'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write:/ 'error'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if itab1-amt2 CA 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt2 CA 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt2 CA '~`!@#$%^&amp;amp;*()-_=+[{]}\|;:'",&amp;lt;.&amp;gt;/?'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write:/ 'error'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if itab1-amt10 CA 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt10 CA 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   itab1-amt10 CA '~`!@#$%^&amp;amp;*()-_=+[{]}\|;:'",&amp;lt;.&amp;gt;/?'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write:/ 'error'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endloop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we have a better approach to do this, instead of repeating the same step for 10 fields? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:40:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990357#M1342405</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-19T18:40:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validating 10 numeric fields - any better approach?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990358#M1342406</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could Macros instead:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
DEFINE check_number.
  if not itab1-amt&amp;amp;1 co '0123456789'.
    write:/ 'error'.
  endif.
END-OF-DEFINITION.

check_number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BUT, as you declared your fields as type of DMBTR, and this is a CURRENCY type, if you try to assign a character that is not a number, should give you a Dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frisoni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990358#M1342406</guid>
      <dc:creator>guilherme_frisoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-19T18:47:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validating 10 numeric fields - any better approach?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990359#M1342407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;or using field symbols&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
data: fieldname(11) type c value 'ITAB1-AMT',
         idx(2) type c.

field-symbls &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; type any.

loop at itab1.
   do 10 times.
      write sy-index to idx. "' 1', ' 2'...'10'
      condense idx. "'1', '2'...'10'
      concatenate fieldname idx into fieldname. "ITAB-AMT1, ITAB-AMT2 ...
       
      assign (fieldname) to &amp;lt;field&amp;gt;. "now &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; stores appropriate value
      if &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' or 
         &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' or
         &amp;lt;field&amp;gt; CA '~`!@#$%^&amp;amp;*()-_=+[{]}\|;:'",&amp;lt;.&amp;gt;/?'.
        write: / 'error'.
      endif.
   enddo.
endloop.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990359#M1342407</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcinPciak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-19T18:55:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validating 10 numeric fields - any better approach?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990360#M1342408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You Marcin Pciak and Frisoni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It worked. I've awarded points to you both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/validating-10-numeric-fields-any-better-approach/m-p/5990360#M1342408</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-19T19:37:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

