<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FB02 Authorization Issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965306#M1338355</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Design of the tcode is based on the tcode's program which you can check in se93.If in program edit is not specified for blind date then you cannot edit if you need to modify the blind date then you need to change the program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Or you can enble trace st01 and check which auth object is getting checked when you update blind date, according to that you can change the auth object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this clarifies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-24T13:25:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965296#M1338345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible in SAP to allow the users to change the document on the assignment field, text field, reference field &amp;amp; the document header field etc but NOT allow the users to change the blind date field through FB02 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please Help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kakali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965296#M1338345</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T14:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965297#M1338346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check what authorization object is checked to change the "blind date field" through authorization trace in ST01.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Restrict authorization accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sandip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965297#M1338346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T14:39:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965298#M1338347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To know whether SAP provides restriction on certain field, we can first check whether there is an authorizaiton field exists for those fields. Please check the filed name (document number - BELNR) with the entries available in SU20. if this field doesn;t exist means SAP doesn't provide any checks or restrictions for that specific filed. In such cases you need to develop your own auhtorization objects and include them in the respective programs (Modify source code).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gowrinadh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965298#M1338347</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T14:48:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965299#M1338348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pardon my ignorance, but what &lt;EM&gt;is&lt;/EM&gt; a "blind date field"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are refering to the "valuta datum" then you control this via the permitted posting periods =&amp;gt; transaction OB52 etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965299#M1338348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T19:53:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965300#M1338349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think he is referring to Base Line Date when he says "blind date" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we had a similar requirement, which we addressed using custom coding and custom authorization objects. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I beleive you cannot control this with standard authorization objects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965300#M1338349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T20:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965301#M1338350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; we had a similar requirement, which we addressed using custom coding and custom authorization objects. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; I beleive you cannot control this with standard authorization objects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are some other options depending on the situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An alternative would be to create a transaction variant which hides the screen or sets it to display only.  This transaction variant is assigned to a custom tcode and users can use that itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pro's - very quick to create, no change to standard SAP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Con's - you need an extra transaction&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the balance of it, I would probably choose your approach in this situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965301#M1338350</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T22:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965302#M1338351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there's a lot of configuration possible in FI. you can define the screen in a way you need with transactions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O7Z2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O7Z1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O7V1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in addition there are rules that can be defined, screen variants (O7E6) - all of which i would try before i visit SHD0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965302#M1338351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T09:35:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965303#M1338352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would prefer to go with Alex,instead of making changes in IMG, that will changes screen for all he user,this requirement would be for few users only, i would go with Alex..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prasant k Paichha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965303#M1338352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-21T14:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965304#M1338353</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; that will changes screen for all he user&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This should be given preference in my opinion, so that there is consistent system behaviour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The OP does not mention wanting users to have different behaviour even although their access seems the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965304#M1338353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-23T07:06:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965305#M1338354</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; in addition there are rules that can be defined, screen variants (O7E6) - all of which i would try before i visit SHD0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a good point.  Personally I would take a variant transaction over using a PID to control the input screen for the "disallowed" users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965305#M1338354</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-23T19:26:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965306#M1338355</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Design of the tcode is based on the tcode's program which you can check in se93.If in program edit is not specified for blind date then you cannot edit if you need to modify the blind date then you need to change the program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Or you can enble trace st01 and check which auth object is getting checked when you update blind date, according to that you can change the auth object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this clarifies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965306#M1338355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-24T13:25:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB02 Authorization Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965307#M1338356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; 1. Design of the tcode is based on the tcode's program which you can check in se93.If in program edit is not specified for blind date then you cannot edit if you need to modify the blind date then you need to change the program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shweta,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is not correct, as both Mylene &amp;amp; I have given potential alternatives to changing standard program code depending on the exact requirement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb02-authorization-issue/m-p/5965307#M1338356</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-24T13:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

