topic Re: Code inspector (Exceptions -> Approve, Requested) in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Code inspector (Exceptions -> Approve, Requested)

Former Member — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:02:32 GMT

Hi there,

I would like to know what is the purpose of the menu option GOTO --> Exceptions (Approve and requested) in the SCI transaction.

I've been looking for information in SDN but haven't found anything

Basically, I'm in charge of the quality of ABAP programs in my company. It's not easy for me to check the code inspector

result of every single change made by 14 developers... I'd like to know if there's a way to automate the process for

viewing the results of the code inspector Checks..

Thank you!!!

Moderator message - Moved to the correct forum

Edited by: Rob Burbank on Aug 13, 2009 9:02 AM

Re: Code inspector (Exceptions -> Approve, Requested)

HermannGahm — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:01:06 GMT

Hi Felipe,

glad to see you here

For the first part (Exceptions): I haven't seen them in action so far. It should be possible to request an exception for a message and record scope, reason and approver. The second person (approver) can then approve or reject. (4 eyes principle).

For the second part:

You can use SCI on object sets, not only on single objects, is that what you mean?

I'm not sure what you mean by "automate process for viewing the results". Regardless

if you run it on single objects or object sets you have to browse through the resulting messages.

Kind regards,

Hermann Gahm

Re: Code inspector (Exceptions -> Approve, Requested)

Former Member — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:51:27 GMT

Hi Hermann, it's good to see you here! thanks for the info... do you know if it's possible to run one inspection for several

transport requests? I noticed that one request is only possible....

Re: Code inspector (Exceptions -> Approve, Requested)

HermannGahm — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:32:15 GMT

Hi Felipe,

as far as i know one can only check one request at a time.

But you can run the code inspector within SE09 on requests.

Thats maybe a little bit more convenient.

Kind regards,

Hermann