<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EKBE - Reference document in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/ekbe-reference-document/m-p/445574#M13346</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys, I have the following query which I hope you may be able to help me with. I've created a PO. GR-Bsd IV indicator is ticked.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QTY on the PO is 5. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a goods receipt  for 2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processed the vendor invoice for the 2 and then a second vendor invoice for the 3 outstanding even though we have not done a GR for the outstanding 3 items.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I check the table EKBE in the field reference document both invoice line items are both referencing the number of the GR for 2, including the invoice for the 3 items ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this SAP standard I would have expected that the reference document for the Invoice relating to the 3 would have been blank as we haven't received these items or the user would not have been allowed to post this additional invoice ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated thanks in advance &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-05T10:10:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EKBE - Reference document</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/ekbe-reference-document/m-p/445574#M13346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys, I have the following query which I hope you may be able to help me with. I've created a PO. GR-Bsd IV indicator is ticked.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QTY on the PO is 5. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a goods receipt  for 2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processed the vendor invoice for the 2 and then a second vendor invoice for the 3 outstanding even though we have not done a GR for the outstanding 3 items.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I check the table EKBE in the field reference document both invoice line items are both referencing the number of the GR for 2, including the invoice for the 3 items ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this SAP standard I would have expected that the reference document for the Invoice relating to the 3 would have been blank as we haven't received these items or the user would not have been allowed to post this additional invoice ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated thanks in advance &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/ekbe-reference-document/m-p/445574#M13346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-05T10:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

