<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Comparing LRAW datatype and STRING in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770856#M1306540</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;usually to store large amount of binary data sap has provided LRAW type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but you cannot use a field defined with lraw in your where statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;generally performance issue wont be there in storing the data. whether it may be string or lraw. issue will come during the extraction of data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this will surely help you!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks &amp;amp; regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;punit raval.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-01T07:01:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Comparing LRAW datatype and STRING</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770855#M1306539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a scenario where in i need to store a huge amount of data(ex. one Lakh characters) which is in Hexa decimal format in a single field of a table. I was going through some articles mentioning to use LRAW data type (CLUSTR AND CLUSTD) fields. Alternative approach is to use predefined data type as STRING and with length 999999, and i am able to achieve my scenario using string.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now my doubts are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Is it recommended to use 999999 characters in a string , will there be any performance issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) How can i use LRAW data type &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chaitanya.A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770855#M1306539</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T03:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comparing LRAW datatype and STRING</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770856#M1306540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;usually to store large amount of binary data sap has provided LRAW type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but you cannot use a field defined with lraw in your where statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;generally performance issue wont be there in storing the data. whether it may be string or lraw. issue will come during the extraction of data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this will surely help you!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks &amp;amp; regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;punit raval.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770856#M1306540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T07:01:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comparing LRAW datatype and STRING</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770857#M1306541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am considering string data type &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chaitanya.A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparing-lraw-datatype-and-string/m-p/5770857#M1306541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T07:43:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

