<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Comparision between two different approach in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594790#M1275211</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you should not ask such questions, they make no sense,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Write a small report, with &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
get runtime field start 
 ...
 get runtime field stop.

t = stop - start.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and measure them both, run the SQL Trace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result depends to a large extent on the data distribution ... &lt;STRONG&gt;OF YOUR SYSTEM&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-04T07:47:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Comparision between two different approach</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594789#M1275210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know which of the below will be good in terms of performance :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.      SELECT VBELN ERNAM ERDAT VSTEL KUNNR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         FROM LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         INTO TABLE I_LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         WHERE VSTEL IN S_VSTEL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           AND LFART IN S_LFART&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           AND WADAT_IST = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. CONSTANTS: gc_erdat TYPE erdat VALUE IS INITIAL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT VBELN ERNAM ERDAT VSTEL KUNNR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         FROM LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         INTO TABLE I_LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         WHERE VSTEL IN S_VSTEL   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         &lt;STRONG&gt;AND erdat GE gc_erda&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         AND LFART IN S_LFART&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         AND WADAT_IST = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, provide reason for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VSTEL , ERDAT And LFART are fields in secondary index.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594789#M1275210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-04T07:32:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comparision between two different approach</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594790#M1275211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you should not ask such questions, they make no sense,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Write a small report, with &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
get runtime field start 
 ...
 get runtime field stop.

t = stop - start.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and measure them both, run the SQL Trace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result depends to a large extent on the data distribution ... &lt;STRONG&gt;OF YOUR SYSTEM&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594790#M1275211</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-04T07:47:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comparision between two different approach</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594791#M1275212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT VBELN ERNAM ERDAT VSTEL KUNNR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FROM LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;INTO TABLE I_LIKP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE VSTEL IN S_VSTEL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND erdat GE gc_erda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND LFART IN S_LFART&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND WADAT_IST = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the best, since we should avoid hard cording and more filteration as much as possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shashi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/comparision-between-two-different-approach/m-p/5594791#M1275212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-04T12:25:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

