<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to avoid the BAPI_TRANSACTON COMMIT effect on next  calling FM. in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408417#M1241972</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am  calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL ( along with BAPI_TRASACTION_COMMIT ) and  WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  in the sequence as per the requirement in a report .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  always getting failed (with sy-subrc = 1 )becoz of the previous BAPI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under start-of-selection event  if WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  called first and BAPI 2nd in sequence ,then every thing is fine and gettig  sy-subrc = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to avoid the impact of bapi in this regard and what are all the syatem varriables need to be cleared before calling WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-09T08:26:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to avoid the BAPI_TRANSACTON COMMIT effect on next  calling FM.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408415#M1241970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to avoid the BAPI_TRANSACTON COMMIT effect on next  calling FM in a report program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sriram&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: SRIRAM on Apr 8, 2009 5:50 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:37:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408415#M1241970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-07T13:37:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to avoid the BAPI_TRANSACTON COMMIT effect on next  calling FM.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408416#M1241971</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you elaborate...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shailaja Ainala.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408416#M1241971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-08T12:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to avoid the BAPI_TRANSACTON COMMIT effect on next  calling FM.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408417#M1241972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am  calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL ( along with BAPI_TRASACTION_COMMIT ) and  WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  in the sequence as per the requirement in a report .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  always getting failed (with sy-subrc = 1 )becoz of the previous BAPI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under start-of-selection event  if WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE  called first and BAPI 2nd in sequence ,then every thing is fine and gettig  sy-subrc = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to avoid the impact of bapi in this regard and what are all the syatem varriables need to be cleared before calling WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/how-to-avoid-the-bapi-transacton-commit-effect-on-next-calling-fm/m-p/5408417#M1241972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-09T08:26:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

