<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Regarding Field catalog in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285658#M1219658</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was doing some change in an existing program. I added a new field in the internal table and was expecting the field to come up in the output ALV. But I was surprised to see that FM 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE' was not updating the field catalog with the new field  although it shifted the next field (next to the new field in the sequence of fields while declaration) by one column. Like I added the field at 26th position in the internal table and when I see in the field catalog it shows field positioned at 25th and 27th position skipping the new field which is very surprising. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Although I know I can manually make an entry in the field catalog with column = 26 and field attributes but still I want to know the reason. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anyone come across such weird situation? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhaskar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bhaskar_Tripath</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:04:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285658#M1219658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was doing some change in an existing program. I added a new field in the internal table and was expecting the field to come up in the output ALV. But I was surprised to see that FM 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE' was not updating the field catalog with the new field  although it shifted the next field (next to the new field in the sequence of fields while declaration) by one column. Like I added the field at 26th position in the internal table and when I see in the field catalog it shows field positioned at 25th and 27th position skipping the new field which is very surprising. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Although I know I can manually make an entry in the field catalog with column = 26 and field attributes but still I want to know the reason. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anyone come across such weird situation? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhaskar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285658#M1219658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bhaskar_Tripath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285659#M1219659</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bhaskar , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   Kindly use the parameter I_BYPASSING_BUFFER  , in the FM , pass the value X .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ans see if the catalog is created properly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285659#M1219659</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:15:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285660#M1219660</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Declre the 26th filed by using LIKE insted of TYPE..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ex: material like mara-matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285660#M1219660</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285661#M1219661</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arun,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its not working either.. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="sad"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhaskar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285661#M1219661</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bhaskar_Tripath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285662#M1219662</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pedda,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried using LIKE and TYPE both. But none of them is working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhaskar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285662#M1219662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bhaskar_Tripath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:23:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285663#M1219663</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Is the object define in the same way as the other objects in the internal table , using LIKE .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If yes , one option can be to active the program , logoff , login and try to execute the program again , so that the buffer in teh system gets cleared.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please revert back in case this also dones not help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarads,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285663#M1219663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285664#M1219664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;r u using grid or  list display .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have sufficient length for all fields .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do one thing comment the population of fields after the field which u added again .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and  check the o/p is coming  correct or not .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;because if we give  fcat-col_pos = &amp;lt;number &amp;gt; it should work at any cost .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and  have u appended all fields to field catalog .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check the appending values and length once .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285664#M1219664</guid>
      <dc:creator>kamesh_g</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T08:28:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285665#M1219665</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already tried logging off and then execute the program but this doesn't solve the problem.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285665#M1219665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bhaskar_Tripath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T10:16:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285666#M1219666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check whether the database table or the structure which you specify has the 26th Field or not. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the structure and internal table should be in same order and fields should be of same data types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are sure about it, then definitely output should come.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Else please show the code. Which could help you and others to learn something to a greater extent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285666#M1219666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T10:57:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Field catalog</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285667#M1219667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please share the table declaration and the function call.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advait&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-field-catalog/m-p/5285667#M1219667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T11:14:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

