<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic performance issue with MKPF table in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-with-mkpf-table/m-p/5285286#M1219609</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My requirement is  to get the material documents based on process orders. For this   I used XBLNR(Reference Document Number ) in where condition  of  SELECT statement on  MKPF table. But this is taking more time for accessing the table. Then I tried with Secondary Index on this field, but unfortunately it is affecting negative impact on programs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please suggest me on this how to proceed for getting material documents with reference to process orders?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vempati&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:10:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-06T16:10:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance issue with MKPF table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-with-mkpf-table/m-p/5285286#M1219609</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My requirement is  to get the material documents based on process orders. For this   I used XBLNR(Reference Document Number ) in where condition  of  SELECT statement on  MKPF table. But this is taking more time for accessing the table. Then I tried with Secondary Index on this field, but unfortunately it is affecting negative impact on programs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please suggest me on this how to proceed for getting material documents with reference to process orders?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vempati&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:10:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-with-mkpf-table/m-p/5285286#M1219609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-06T16:10:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue with MKPF table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-with-mkpf-table/m-p/5285287#M1219610</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Search results here|https://forums.sdn.sap.com/search.jspa?q=mkpf%20performance&amp;amp;dateRange=last90days&amp;amp;searchID=23205030&amp;amp;rankBy=10001&amp;amp;start=0]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-with-mkpf-table/m-p/5285287#M1219610</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member156446</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-06T16:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

