<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RFC_READ_TABLE without 512 byte limits! in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246004#M1212097</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may split the RFC call and store it into different internal table and join it back after executing the FM. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-22T12:01:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RFC_READ_TABLE without 512 byte limits!</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246002#M1212095</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody knows about an alternative to RFC_READ_TABLE (or RFC_GET_TABLE_ENTRIES or TABLE_ENTRIES_GET_VIA_RFC) that does not impose a limit over 512 bytes column width?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to access a table from outside SAP, and a special requirement is that we DO NOT DEVELOP/INSTALL ANYTHING NEW over the system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know of an option? RFC FM? Web Service? etc??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246002#M1212095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-24T17:54:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC_READ_TABLE without 512 byte limits!</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246003#M1212096</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;See note 1186277.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246003#M1212096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-24T18:01:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC_READ_TABLE without 512 byte limits!</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246004#M1212097</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may split the RFC call and store it into different internal table and join it back after executing the FM. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-read-table-without-512-byte-limits/m-p/5246004#M1212097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-22T12:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

