<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Left outer join in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111317#M1185771</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds purely academic to me, please provide explanation why you want to avoid (left) joins in the first place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-03T16:56:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Left outer join</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111316#M1185770</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to avoid left outer join , like in case of inner join we use 'select for all entries' and read statement,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can we acheive the same for left outer join case , please provide the explanation with example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sanju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111316#M1185770</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanju_joseph</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T15:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Left outer join</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111317#M1185771</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds purely academic to me, please provide explanation why you want to avoid (left) joins in the first place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111317#M1185771</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T16:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Left outer join</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111318#M1185772</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one of our program they have used left outer join to join 6 tables, I have seen &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time taken is more , to avoid this i  break this into loops within &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;loop and found that time taken is small ,but the count of the record got increased for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the missing value on some column,it seems like  i am doing something wrong,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so example to avoid left join will be higly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sanju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111318#M1185772</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanju_joseph</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-04T05:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Left outer join</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111319#M1185773</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post the Join statement here for analysis, because I suspect that the performance problem might not be the join in itself but rather missing index support. If Z-tables are involved, also post their primary and secondary indexes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111319#M1185773</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-04T08:03:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Left outer join</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111320#M1185774</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sanju Joseph,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can avoid the Left outer join when you dont want the null values from the right table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Left table is : SPFLI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right table is : SFLIGHT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want the common data without getting the null values from the table SFLIGHT y becoz left outer join gets the null values from the right table when a partiucular record is not matching.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So , if u dont want those unneccessary values into your table  then you can avoid the left outer join.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kiran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/left-outer-join/m-p/5111320#M1185774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T05:00:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

