<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic performance issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067349#M1177378</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;Moderator message: please use more informative subject in future&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can i improve the performance of the following select statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;g_viewname = VIAUF_AFVC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SELECT * FROM (g_viewname)                             &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lt_task              &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_aufrueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       WHERE aufnr = lt_aufrueck-aufnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         AND rueck = lt_aufrueck-rueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND auart IN auart_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND iphas IN r_iphas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND arbid IN arbid_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND werks IN werks_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND equnr IN equnr_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          AND tplnr IN strno_o          &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND larnt IN larnt_o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Matt on Feb 3, 2009 9:56 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimMuchena</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-03T05:04:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067349#M1177378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;Moderator message: please use more informative subject in future&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can i improve the performance of the following select statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;g_viewname = VIAUF_AFVC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SELECT * FROM (g_viewname)                             &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lt_task              &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_aufrueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       WHERE aufnr = lt_aufrueck-aufnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         AND rueck = lt_aufrueck-rueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND auart IN auart_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND iphas IN r_iphas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND arbid IN arbid_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND werks IN werks_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND equnr IN equnr_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          AND tplnr IN strno_o          &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       AND larnt IN larnt_o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Matt on Feb 3, 2009 9:56 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067349#M1177378</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMuchena</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T05:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067350#M1177379</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the following things can improve performance drastically&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1)avoid using select *  and into corresponding fields of &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   instead use the select f1 f2 in to table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Order of where clause should be same as order in the view &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;change the order as &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE aufnr = lt_aufrueck-aufnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND iphas IN r_iphas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND equnr IN equnr_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND auart IN auart_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND tplnr IN strno_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND arbid IN arbid_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND werks IN werks_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND larnt IN larnt_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND rueck = lt_aufrueck-rueck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Sumanth Nag Kristam on Feb 3, 2009 7:07 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067350#M1177379</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T06:05:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067351#M1177380</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;Please use more informative subject in future&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067351#M1177380</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T08:57:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067352#M1177381</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First check the table lt_aufrueck for values&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remove * and mention only the required fields&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also remove into corresponding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mention the fields in table sequence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use primary keys in where condition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if not lt_aufrueck is initial.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT * FROM (g_viewname) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;INTO OF TABLE lt_task &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_aufrueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE aufnr = lt_aufrueck-aufnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND rueck = lt_aufrueck-rueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND auart IN auart_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND iphas IN r_iphas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND arbid IN arbid_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND werks IN werks_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND equnr IN equnr_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND tplnr IN strno_o &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND larnt IN larnt_o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shiva&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067352#M1177381</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T09:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067353#M1177382</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.Instead of using the view VIAUF_AFVC(as in this SELECT u have done.. all the join conditions are not provided in the where condition) .It will be better to join the below tables(which ever is applicable), and SELECT the field (which ever is applicable) INTO TABLE It_tab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Tables&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFIH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AUFK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFKO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFVC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFVV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ILOA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note:make sure to provide max. key fields or index fields in the where condition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mukundan.R&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:38:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067353#M1177382</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T10:38:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067354#M1177383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; well seeing the code i can say &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. dont use..... into corresponding fields of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Access only required fields in place of using * for selection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. In where clause give the key fields first and then give other fields....and also the order of the fields should be like same as there in table for better performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mohit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Mohit Kumar on Feb 3, 2009 12:57 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067354#M1177383</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T11:57:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067355#M1177384</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check if you can remove the View and use JOIN to fetch data from the repective tables and populating the fields as required in a simpler way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ensure to utilize the maximum available key fileds to improve the performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also check if the internal table conati some entries. (which is used in the for all entries)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radhika&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:57:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067355#M1177384</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T08:57:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067356#M1177385</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.Please check lt_aufrueck is initial or not and then proceed with the selection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; if lt_aufrueck[]  is not initial.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here REFRESH lt_task .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write select here &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Refresh the internal table before populating it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH lt_task.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.Dont use * and into corresponding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.Take all the primary keys when selecting fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067356#M1177385</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T09:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067357#M1177386</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;instead of using into corresponding fields which will affect performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;use field names individullay in the order as they are in int tab, also the where &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;condition in the same order&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ie. if a int tab has fields f1 f2 f3...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;select f1 f2 f3... from (view) into table int ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where f1 =    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          and f2 = ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manoj Kumar P&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067357#M1177386</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T10:40:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067358#M1177387</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to my understanding i hope you are using * since you are not aware of the table from which you are fetching the records?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Yes, Then try this way,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;select fieldname from dd03l into table field_tab where tabname eq g_viewname.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here g_viewname holds the view name that has been fetched at runtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;field_tab declaration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data: field_tab(000040) occurs 0 with header line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now to avoid Corresponding field of:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create a Dynamic Internal table with View Structure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We know the view name G_viewname.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: xfc TYPE lvc_s_fcat,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      ifc TYPE lvc_t_fcat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    EXPORTING&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      i_program_name               = sy-repid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   I_STRUCTURE_NAME             = g_viewname&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    CHANGING&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      ct_fieldcat                  = ifc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  CALL METHOD cl_alv_table_create=&amp;gt;create_dynamic_table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    EXPORTING&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      it_fieldcatalog           = ifc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    IMPORTING&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      ep_table                  = dreft.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data: dreft type ref to data,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        drefl type ref to data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;field-symbols: &amp;lt;upload&amp;gt; type table,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                     &amp;lt;fs_worka&amp;gt; type any.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ASSIGN dreft-&amp;gt;* TO &amp;lt;upload&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  CREATE DATA drefl LIKE LINE OF &amp;lt;upload&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ASSIGN drefl-&amp;gt;* TO &amp;lt;fs_worka&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now in your query you can use as this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT (field_tab) FROM (g_viewname) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;INTO TABLE &amp;lt;upload&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_aufrueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE aufnr = lt_aufrueck-aufnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND rueck = lt_aufrueck-rueck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND auart IN auart_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND iphas IN r_iphas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND arbid IN arbid_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND werks IN werks_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND equnr IN equnr_o&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND tplnr IN strno_o &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND larnt IN larnt_o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this might have helped you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prashanth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067358#M1177387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-05T15:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067359#M1177388</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please run an SQL Trace and tell us what more about the actual problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How long does it run, how many records are read?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see why you dynamic coding here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the driver table empty, should not, how many records are in there?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue/m-p/5067359#M1177388</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-09T07:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

