<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LUW implementation between RFC calls in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034852#M1170993</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                I have a quick requirement in which i have to implement LUW explicitly during RFC call.My &lt;STRONG&gt;requirement is as below&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 Rfc for a  &lt;STRONG&gt;Ztable&lt;/STRONG&gt; these are &lt;STRONG&gt;1. Zcreate_entry , 2.Zupdate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3. Zdelete_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Now i want to create a explicit session for all the operation done by these Rfcs so that at the end of the session i can &lt;STRONG&gt;commit&lt;/STRONG&gt; all the  operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User will call 1 RFC for leting me know that now start a new session.now user will &lt;STRONG&gt;insert 5 entry in Ztable by calling Zcreate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;(Actually this data should not be saved in ZTable) , &lt;STRONG&gt;Update 4 Entry in Ztable by calling Zupdate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;(Actually this data should not be updated in ZTable) , &lt;STRONG&gt;delete few entry same way&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now user will &lt;STRONG&gt;call 1 Rfc for ending this session(for letting me know only that end this session)&lt;/STRONG&gt; , At this point only all the data changes (inserted , updated and deleted ) should be actually reflected in database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abhishek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 20, 2009 12:43 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 20, 2009 12:43 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-20T08:43:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LUW implementation between RFC calls</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034852#M1170993</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                I have a quick requirement in which i have to implement LUW explicitly during RFC call.My &lt;STRONG&gt;requirement is as below&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 Rfc for a  &lt;STRONG&gt;Ztable&lt;/STRONG&gt; these are &lt;STRONG&gt;1. Zcreate_entry , 2.Zupdate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3. Zdelete_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Now i want to create a explicit session for all the operation done by these Rfcs so that at the end of the session i can &lt;STRONG&gt;commit&lt;/STRONG&gt; all the  operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User will call 1 RFC for leting me know that now start a new session.now user will &lt;STRONG&gt;insert 5 entry in Ztable by calling Zcreate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;(Actually this data should not be saved in ZTable) , &lt;STRONG&gt;Update 4 Entry in Ztable by calling Zupdate_entry&lt;/STRONG&gt;(Actually this data should not be updated in ZTable) , &lt;STRONG&gt;delete few entry same way&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now user will &lt;STRONG&gt;call 1 Rfc for ending this session(for letting me know only that end this session)&lt;/STRONG&gt; , At this point only all the data changes (inserted , updated and deleted ) should be actually reflected in database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abhishek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 20, 2009 12:43 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 20, 2009 12:43 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034852#M1170993</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-20T08:43:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUW implementation between RFC calls</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034853#M1170994</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see no question .... what is your actual problem ????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise just go ahead and do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034853#M1170994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-20T12:22:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUW implementation between RFC calls</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034854#M1170995</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Process must call function BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT (or similar) at end of transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034854#M1170995</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-20T12:27:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUW implementation between RFC calls</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034855#M1170996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        If you have not got the problem , let me explain complete scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are three RFcs for creating , updating and deleting in database table(Ztable).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now these Rfcs will be called from web dynpro, In WD screen user may call Create RFC 5 times for creating entry in Ztable ,then he can call Update RFC for updating in Ztable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After doing all these operations in single session now he wants to end the session, so before closing the session WD notifies to backend that now &lt;STRONG&gt;at this point only&lt;/STRONG&gt; save all the changes to the backend thus for all the operations commit will happen now only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Another requirement is * that  from WD screen if user1 has created 5 records but he has &lt;STRONG&gt;not commited&lt;/STRONG&gt; these changes to database now if User1 searches for just inserted recorded(&lt;STRONG&gt;which is not commited yet) , how to provide&lt;/STRONG&gt; these records to the User1 because these records are &lt;STRONG&gt;not in Ztable at that point of time.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abhishek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034855#M1170996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-21T05:40:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUW implementation between RFC calls</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034856#M1170997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anybody got an idea about the second requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/luw-implementation-between-rfc-calls/m-p/5034856#M1170997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-22T06:02:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

