<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Package size in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/package-size/m-p/4997658#M1163934</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you are missing the point!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Package siue only makes sense if there is another processing afterwards, which should not process large numbers of records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And in your question, nobody can see whether the select will find at least 4000 records, if not then they are identical !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-08T15:29:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Package size</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/package-size/m-p/4997657#M1163933</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guide me which select is faster and how???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I) SELECT a~matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_werk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_lager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          a~equnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_charge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~lbbsa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_esn PACKAGE SIZE 40000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          FROM equi AS a INNER JOIN eqbs AS b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          ON a&lt;SUB&gt;equnr = b&lt;/SUB&gt;equnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           WHERE  a~matnr IN s_matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;             AND   b~b_werk IN s_werks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;             AND b~lbbsa IN ('01','07','03').&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processing contain some other select statements using for all entries from the above statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;endselect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(II)  SELECT a~matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_werk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_lager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          a~equnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~b_charge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          b~lbbsa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_esn &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          FROM equi AS a INNER JOIN eqbs AS b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          ON a&lt;SUB&gt;equnr = b&lt;/SUB&gt;equnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           WHERE  a~matnr IN s_matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;             AND   b~b_werk IN s_werks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;             AND b~lbbsa IN ('01','07','03').&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processing contain some other select statements using for all entries from the above statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Ram Ram on Jan 8, 2009 2:20 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/package-size/m-p/4997657#M1163933</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-08T13:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Package size</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/package-size/m-p/4997658#M1163934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you are missing the point!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Package siue only makes sense if there is another processing afterwards, which should not process large numbers of records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And in your question, nobody can see whether the select will find at least 4000 records, if not then they are identical !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/package-size/m-p/4997658#M1163934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-08T15:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

