<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Avoid 'commit-work'; LUW-Logic in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990661#M1162548</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a problem in our luw! Although we do not use an explicit 'commit work' in one of our dialog-programs, a 'rollback' does not work correctly. I have tried to trace the sql-units while execution the program and find out that there are a whole of commit works in the trace-protocoll.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.423       105 SAPLSEUJ PROGDIR    EXECSTM 119      1     1      0 R/3   1  UPDATE SET "RSTAT" = 'S' , "UNAM" = &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.423       944 SAPLSYDB            EXECSTA                0      0 R/3   1  &lt;STRONG&gt;COMMIT WORK&lt;/STRONG&gt;                         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.426       267 SAPLSYDB            EXECSTA                0      0 R/3   1  &lt;STRONG&gt;COMMIT WORK&lt;/STRONG&gt;    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any chance to avoid such implicit commit-works?                    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-13T08:59:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Avoid 'commit-work'; LUW-Logic</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990661#M1162548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a problem in our luw! Although we do not use an explicit 'commit work' in one of our dialog-programs, a 'rollback' does not work correctly. I have tried to trace the sql-units while execution the program and find out that there are a whole of commit works in the trace-protocoll.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.423       105 SAPLSEUJ PROGDIR    EXECSTM 119      1     1      0 R/3   1  UPDATE SET "RSTAT" = 'S' , "UNAM" = &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.423       944 SAPLSYDB            EXECSTA                0      0 R/3   1  &lt;STRONG&gt;COMMIT WORK&lt;/STRONG&gt;                         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;09:44:21.426       267 SAPLSYDB            EXECSTA                0      0 R/3   1  &lt;STRONG&gt;COMMIT WORK&lt;/STRONG&gt;    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any chance to avoid such implicit commit-works?                    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990661#M1162548</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-13T08:59:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoid 'commit-work'; LUW-Logic</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990662#M1162549</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;nobody any ideas? &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990662#M1162549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-13T09:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoid 'commit-work'; LUW-Logic</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990663#M1162550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some ABAP keywords have implicit commits. nothing can be done about them. For statements which requires explicit commits we can use the ROLLBACK WORK statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990663#M1162550</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-13T09:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Avoid 'commit-work'; LUW-Logic</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990664#M1162551</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/avoid-commit-work-luw-logic/m-p/4990664#M1162551</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-13T12:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

