<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Structural Authorizations in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904588#M1145218</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm implementing Structural Auths for a HCM implementation. The regular security is working for the regular users. My requirement was for 5 global managers, and I do need structural auths for them. My question is, in using position based security, do I need to assign all positions a structural auth, or can I just assign the managers one, and have a dummy structural auth? It's kind of unclear in the documenation how to handle users that don't need them? Thanks so much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:24:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-16T01:24:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Structural Authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904588#M1145218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm implementing Structural Auths for a HCM implementation. The regular security is working for the regular users. My requirement was for 5 global managers, and I do need structural auths for them. My question is, in using position based security, do I need to assign all positions a structural auth, or can I just assign the managers one, and have a dummy structural auth? It's kind of unclear in the documenation how to handle users that don't need them? Thanks so much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:24:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904588#M1145218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-16T01:24:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Structural Authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904589#M1145219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Gigi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thw basic idea behind indirect provisioning would be to create a role/position and define authorizations based on them. Then you provide all these positions etc to users directly, using various HR transactions.You can get a list of documents for the same topic from the websites, which you need to discuss with some HR consultant as this knd of provisioning involves a lot of HR activities, rather majorly its all about HR indirect provisioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hersh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904589#M1145219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-16T08:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Structural Authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904590#M1145220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gigi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you only want to use structural security for the Five managers, just assign the structural authorization to those five - (that is to their positions).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All users who are not assigned a to structural profile will get the structural profile assigned to SAP* in OOSB. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can then restrict the structural access for the rest of the organization by creating at "Dummy" structural profile and assign it to SAP* in OOSB, or if you do not want  any additional structural control, leave the SAP* user with the profile ALL, The structural access will then remain unchanged for the rest of your organisation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Morten Nielsen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-authorizations/m-p/4904590#M1145220</guid>
      <dc:creator>morten_nielsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-16T13:38:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

