<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Authorization checks vs ST01 data in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669420#M1098339</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the issue is that you want to prevent users from posting a zero value invoice, then you will need to look in the IMG customizing for an option (and in the ERP Finance forums).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not aware that you can control this using authorizations. At least, not without adding your own code somwhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-28T14:50:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Authorization checks vs ST01 data</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669416#M1098335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Experts. My 1st post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Just tried to find on the forum about my issue and could not find anything. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question: How could ST01 shows that the user passed on the authorization check if he have authorization to a fixed value different?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The user have VKORG assigned as MX* on 2 different roles. Using SE16 and AGR_1252 on both roles i have the value MX*.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Opened the ST01 and set for the user received the message below. See that the first line have VKORG= ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:34:342   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_VKO RC=0	VKORG= ;ACTVT=19;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:34:434   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_VKO RC=0	VKORG=MX02;ACTVT=01;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:34:434   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_FKA RC=0	FKART=F2;ACTVT=01;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:35: 4   AUT.	  - - -	P_ORGIN    RC=0	INFTY=0001;SUBTY=' ';AUTHC=R;PERSA=&lt;STRONG&gt;;PERSG=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;PERSK=&lt;STRONG&gt;;VDSK1=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:35: 7   AUT.	  - - -	P_ORGIN    RC=0	INFTY=0002;SUBTY=' ';AUTHC=R;PERSA=&lt;STRONG&gt;;PERSG=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;PERSK=&lt;STRONG&gt;;VDSK1=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:35:11   AUT.	  - - -	P_ORGIN    RC=0	INFTY=0900;SUBTY=' ';AUTHC=R;PERSA=&lt;STRONG&gt;;PERSG=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;PERSK=&lt;STRONG&gt;;VDSK1=&lt;/STRONG&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:36:133   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_VKO RC=0	VKORG=MX02;ACTVT=01;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:36:133   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_FKA RC=0	FKART=ZLAT;ACTVT=01;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;20:18:37:888   AUT.	  - - -	S_CTS_ADMI RC=0	CTS_ADMFCT=TABL;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is that the user while execution a procedure to create a few invoices have them with ZERO "0" Value on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On most cases there is no problem with it, this happens sometimes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry if I Could not express right and will put more information if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669416#M1098335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T13:50:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization checks vs ST01 data</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669417#M1098336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; 20:18:34:342   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_VKO RC=0	VKORG= ;ACTVT=19;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think (not completely sure here) the authorization check above just checks the activity and does not bother about the value of the VKORG field. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another possibility is that some authority-checks have been switched off for this transaction. Have a look in transaction SU24. If an authority-check is disabled it will always show up in the trace with RC=0, regardless of the users' actual authorizations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jurjen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669417#M1098336</guid>
      <dc:creator>jurjen_heeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T14:07:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization checks vs ST01 data</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669418#M1098337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Vladimir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the value MX* covers also MX02. so the user is authorizted for MX02....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the moment I cannot see an issue with the result of ST01, which you have copied here into yur post.  Looks correct for me....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b.rgds, Bernhard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669418#M1098337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernhard_SAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T14:47:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization checks vs ST01 data</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669419#M1098338</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 20:18:34:342   AUT.	  - - -	V_VBRK_VKO RC=0	VKORG= ;ACTVT=19;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; I think (not completely sure here) the authorization check above just checks the activity and does not bother about the value of the VKORG field. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jurjen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you are right. This is a typcal case for the check for value 'dummy'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b.rgds, Bernhard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669419#M1098338</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernhard_SAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T14:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization checks vs ST01 data</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669420#M1098339</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the issue is that you want to prevent users from posting a zero value invoice, then you will need to look in the IMG customizing for an option (and in the ERP Finance forums).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not aware that you can control this using authorizations. At least, not without adding your own code somwhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-checks-vs-st01-data/m-p/4669420#M1098339</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T14:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

