topic Regarding Badi implementation in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Regarding Badi implementation

Former Member — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:52:23 GMT

Hello All,

I have a query regarding the implementation of the BADI

Steps followed :-

1.Using transaction se19 , I have created a implementation fo the badi ( just the layout )

I have to write abap coding in the method of this particular badi . I have a parameter defined in the badi

parameter - phead

type - changing

type method - type

associated type - ABCD ( referencing to a structure )

2. I am trying to use this parameter in this method like

delete phead where vto<sy-datlo.

3. Following error occurs -

phead is not an internal table -the"OCCURS n " specification is missing .

Could you kinldy tell me the reason for this error ? I am not supposed to use this parameter inside the program ?

thanks and Regards,

Swetha

Re: Regarding Badi implementation

Former Member — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:06:14 GMT

Hi,

Just comment the statement Delete.

delete phead where vto<sy-datlo. <--comment it.

Set a breakpoint in this method and Check whether phead is getting multiple values or not ( i.e internal table or not).

if only 1 value is populated in phead, then ur delete statement is not correct.

Revert back,.

Regards,

Naveen

Re: Regarding Badi implementation

Former Member — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:07:46 GMT

Hi Swetha,

PHEAD seems to be a structure.

Try this code

if phead-vto < sy-datlo.
clear phead.
endif.

Best regards,

Prashant

Re: Regarding Badi implementation

Former Member — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:28:34 GMT

The value is not getting passed to the badi .... So could you tell me what exactly is the issue

Thanks and Regards,

Swetha

topic *Regarding Badi implementation * in Application Development and Automation Discussions

*Regarding Badi implementation *

Re: *Regarding Badi implementation *

Re: *Regarding Badi implementation *

Re: *Regarding Badi implementation *

topic Regarding Badi implementation in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Regarding Badi implementation

Re: Regarding Badi implementation

Re: Regarding Badi implementation

Re: Regarding Badi implementation