<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RFC BAPI call vs. SE37 execute process differently in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116356#M107549</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can execute BAPI_PO_CREATE1 using SE37, put a negative value in on the POCOND table, COND_VALUE field, and I get my PO created with a negative discount amount condition record.  Yet, when it is called from XI, only a positive value is passed in to the created PO.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While processing goods receipts, I have differences in processing as well.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there some flags that need to be set/changed, so that I can call a BAPI remotely and have it process the same way as SE37?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-31T22:58:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RFC BAPI call vs. SE37 execute process differently</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116356#M107549</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can execute BAPI_PO_CREATE1 using SE37, put a negative value in on the POCOND table, COND_VALUE field, and I get my PO created with a negative discount amount condition record.  Yet, when it is called from XI, only a positive value is passed in to the created PO.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While processing goods receipts, I have differences in processing as well.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there some flags that need to be set/changed, so that I can call a BAPI remotely and have it process the same way as SE37?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116356#M107549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-31T22:58:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC BAPI call vs. SE37 execute process differently</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116357#M107550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you putting the sign in front while calling from XI?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are no separate flags in the code that would make it drop the sign..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh Datti&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116357#M107550</guid>
      <dc:creator>suresh_datti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-31T23:55:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC BAPI call vs. SE37 execute process differently</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116358#M107551</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont think there is a flag to specify this! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you check your XML-mapping with XI? The problem could very well be in the XI side!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116358#M107551</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-31T23:58:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFC BAPI call vs. SE37 execute process differently</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116359#M107552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it is not an XI problem.  I've put error log write statements in, the values are negative before the call to BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and BAPI_PO_CHANGE.  But, are positive when returning from them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfc-bapi-call-vs-se37-execute-process-differently/m-p/1116359#M107552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-01T16:21:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

