<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Simple Question - Data Import in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/simple-question-data-import/m-p/4456086#M1056303</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a simple question. Is it wise to change our actual import scenarios for input data from systems out of sap to XI?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today we have the scenario that data from outer systems will send per ftp to a special directory. After that a report will transform the data into a batchinput. The btci will send per rfbibl into the system. Now we have a huge number of such reports. Will it now be better to change to XI, which we use perhaps for MDM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Xi could take the file from ftp-srever maps the fields an will send per bapi to sap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a quite simple scenario or is batchinput still the better way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-10T15:15:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simple Question - Data Import</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/simple-question-data-import/m-p/4456086#M1056303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a simple question. Is it wise to change our actual import scenarios for input data from systems out of sap to XI?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today we have the scenario that data from outer systems will send per ftp to a special directory. After that a report will transform the data into a batchinput. The btci will send per rfbibl into the system. Now we have a huge number of such reports. Will it now be better to change to XI, which we use perhaps for MDM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Xi could take the file from ftp-srever maps the fields an will send per bapi to sap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a quite simple scenario or is batchinput still the better way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/simple-question-data-import/m-p/4456086#M1056303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-10T15:15:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple Question - Data Import</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/simple-question-data-import/m-p/4456087#M1056304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a scenario where you have different file formats , which needs to be converted and then send to different systems based on some conditions , then suggested is XI usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, also if you already have XI installed and running for the MDM system , then you can think of routing all messages through XI.  It may make sense to use one system for all routing and data conversion puposes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this view helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheerio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/simple-question-data-import/m-p/4456087#M1056304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-11T11:20:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

