<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421033#M1050028</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;read with binary search is only necessary if you have a lot of records in you're internal table (&amp;gt;10.000 for instance)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;otherwise you won't notice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;arthur de smidt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-02T21:17:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421028#M1050023</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is better performance wise?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Select single * or Read with Binary Search?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one will take lesser time?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the reasons for that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Archana.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421028#M1050023</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T18:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421029#M1050024</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP work's on 3 tier arch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read take's lesser time than select single why because read statement happens n application layer whereas select single will go to the DB table to fetch data here where condition is important based on which indexes will be used , so if the where cluase contains fields other than key and  indexes fields it would take much longer time to fetch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note : before doing read binary search sort the itab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: karthik arunachalam on Sep 3, 2008 12:00 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:25:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421029#M1050024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T18:25:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421030#M1050025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Karthik, thank you for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would do a Select before read as well right ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So wont the select into table and read time and Select single * time be same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Archana.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:37:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421030#M1050025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T18:37:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421031#M1050026</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mmmmm....  Select single hits the database now and then, the connectivity between the database and application layer will cost more time. In lay man terms Its like this you have a rack full of books you pull all the necessary books once and use it for reference thatu2019s one type and the other is when ever you need to refer a book you go to the rack and pick it up and refer the time taken for you to reach the rack will consume time rite!!! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you are clear with the above explanation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421031#M1050026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T18:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421032#M1050027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you try the SE30 (Tips and Tricks button)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can code two diferent codes and compare time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421032#M1050027</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodrigo_paisante3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T19:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421033#M1050028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;read with binary search is only necessary if you have a lot of records in you're internal table (&amp;gt;10.000 for instance)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;otherwise you won't notice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;arthur de smidt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421033#M1050028</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T21:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421034#M1050029</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obviously "Read Statement" after sorted is good. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still this question is unanswered. How pity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421034#M1050029</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-03T05:40:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421035#M1050030</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Which one is better performance wise?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Select single * or Read with Binary Search?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it does not make much sense to compare these two statements, because they are used for different purposes! They are not replacing each other!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4421035#M1050030</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozsefSzikszai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-03T06:37:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

