topic Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

Former Member — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:32:25 GMT

Dear all,

I want to receive the IDOC data for message type WPUUMS from a java server. Currently i am working on sample values for segments

E1WPU01

E1WPU02

E1WPU03

E1WPU04

E1WPU05

E1WXX01

I am facing problems in passing the correct values .

Its throwing a error message status 51.(Application document not posted) IDoc not fully processed.

can you help me with some dummy data for all the fields in the above segments.

reply ASAP

regards

arun

Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

Former Member — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:22:43 GMT

You have to analyze where exactly the problem is.

There are several reasons why the Idoc did not post:

1) The Data you are sending to post document may be wrong. You may have to validate against valid data in Database.

2) Thre may be some mandatory data which you are not passing through IDoc (Idoc data may be missing).

It is not possible to answer a generic question like this with perfect answer.

Best way is to debug and find out why exactly the problem is, if you know the error message (you may see it in Status record of this IDoc).

Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

Former Member — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:04:10 GMT

Dear All,

What is the tcode for sending phy inventory data through IDOC message typy WVINVE, and also for message type WPUUMS POS interface: Upload sales data (Compressed)

Ex: BD10 for sending material.

Thanks and regards,

Arun.

Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

Former Member — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:58:21 GMT

look at tcode WPMA, maybe you can find it there.

Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

shivhare — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:03:26 GMT

Hi Arun Kumaran

Use Tcode WPER u can u find error and repocrss it.

for IS retail inbound and outbound IDOC monitroing u can this Tcode

Regrads

Amit Shivhare

Re: Inbound problem for message type WPUUMS

Former Member — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:41:47 GMT

Thank you all.