topic Re: Customizing object services toolbar in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Customizing object services toolbar

Former Member — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:30:17 GMT

In transaction QA02 there´s a object services toolbox, in service "atachment list" the list of the documents

appendend to the object is displayed and show a toolbar. I need deactivate button "delete" (some users can't delete documents).

I found information about how customize object services (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/15/7b623c28695c63e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm) but not the toolbar that appear.

Any suggest.

thanks and regards

Laura

Re: Customizing object services toolbar

naimesh_patel — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:01:46 GMT

You can retrict the "DELETE" functionality in the GOS toolbar by authorization object S_OC_ROLE.

Your security consultant can restrict the authorization by using this authorization object.


* for allowing delete
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_OC_ROLE'      
                    ID     'OFFADMI'        
                    FIELD  'ADMINISTRATOR'.

Regards,

Naimesh Patel

Re: Customizing object services toolbar

Former Member — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:33:38 GMT

Thanks Naimesh! I will comment whit my consultant. ¿He only has to assing authorization object? ¿I must write some code?.

Regards

Re: Customizing object services toolbar

naimesh_patel — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:38:01 GMT

No code is required.

Your Security consultant can assign this object to the Users and don't give them the ADMINISTRATOR value.

Regards,

Naimesh Patel

Re: Customizing object services toolbar

Former Member — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:59:31 GMT

Hello Naimesh,

I have exactelly the same problem as Laura. I also already know the authorization object S_OC_ROLE. The problem is: if you assign the object to a user, he is no longer able to delete attachments of other people, but he still can delete own attachements. I'm looking for a solution to allow only creating attachments, but no deleting. Do you have a hint how I can handle this?

Best regards,

Michael