<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic performanance issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327429#M1031114</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am extracting data from three tables EKKO, EKPO, LFA1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now for table ekko and lfa1 i am using inner join and putting data to itab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and from table ekpo i am using for all entries in itab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will it affect performance using above (i.e. both inner join and for all entries together )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;\[removed by moderator\]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sagar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Jan Stallkamp on Aug 25, 2008 4:36 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performanance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327429#M1031114</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am extracting data from three tables EKKO, EKPO, LFA1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now for table ekko and lfa1 i am using inner join and putting data to itab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and from table ekpo i am using for all entries in itab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will it affect performance using above (i.e. both inner join and for all entries together )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="red" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;\[removed by moderator\]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sagar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Jan Stallkamp on Aug 25, 2008 4:36 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327429#M1031114</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performanance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327430#M1031115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;why don't you join all three of them in one go? Don't believe the "use for all entries" hype. Use correct ON and WHERE conditions that narrow down your result set, and you should be fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327430#M1031115</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performanance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327431#M1031116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.First select the enteries fromm ekko &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Then ekpo by using for all entries.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.LFA1 use read statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it will improve the performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327431#M1031116</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performanance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327432#M1031117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A better idea is to go for the database view WB2_V_EKKO_EKPO2 to get master and item data in EKKO and EKPO. I guess you are hitting LFA1 to fetch Vendor details. Use a select endselect for fetching data from the view and from within that fetch the Vendor details from LFA1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
SELECT 
   FROM  wb2_v_ekko_ekpo2
     INTO

     PERFORM fetch_vendor_details.
     PERFORM fill_output_table.

ENDSELECT.

FORM fetch_vendor_details.
 
   Fetch vendor details based on the vendor number picked from the above select.

ENDFORM.

FORM fill_ouput_table.

   Append the fetched data to an internal table

ENDFORM.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:29:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327432#M1031117</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:29:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performanance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327433#M1031118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;well for all entries on a database table forces a full table scan so it is NOT really performing any good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;better try to have a join over all your three tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Florian Kemmer on Aug 25, 2008 11:31 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performanance-issue/m-p/4327433#M1031118</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-25T09:31:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

