topic Re: polymorphism in Application Development and Automation Discussions

polymorphism

Former Member — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:57:29 GMT

hello all

is the below statement correct about Polymorphism ?

" Search for the right implementation of a method is carried out by the user "

thnx....

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:02:59 GMT

It is both.

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:05:15 GMT

that means the statement is true for polymorphism?

Re: polymorphism

matt — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:08:19 GMT

No. Rather the opposite.

Re: polymorphism

bpawanchand — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:46:03 GMT

In simple if you want to define the term Polymorphism then

ONE FORM MANY ACTIONS

Regards

Pavan

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:23:19 GMT

Sorry to disagree with you. It is either Polymorphic (both or more) or it is Morphophobiastic (neither, or less...).

We have discussed this before, and if the search is used then this should be clear!

Re: polymorphism

matt — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:30:26 GMT

Morphophobiasticism is in violation of monoinstantiationist singular philosophy, so, de jure, it ain't allowed. Unless inherited of course... ok you've persuaded me.

Definitely. Use the search for this type of question.

Polymorphism is the evolution of parrots.

Re: polymorphism

GrahamRobbo — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:36:13 GMT

) I'm really enjoying this thread.

Re: polymorphism

ThomasZloch — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:55:41 GMT

It all depends on the carcastial perceptence of differentiality. If that exceeds the polyglottal points-rewards ratio by a factor of two, we might end up with a genuine monocoque disfraction.

Thomas

Re: polymorphism

matt — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:08:04 GMT

Das ist einfach für Sie zu sagen.

That is easy for you to say.

Edited by: Matthew Billingham on Jul 18, 2008 2:19 PM

Added translation for the benefit of non-german speakers

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:37:58 GMT


> It all depends on the carcastial perceptence of differentiality. If that exceeds the polyglottal points-rewards ratio by a factor of two, we might end up with a genuine monocoque disfraction.
> Thomas

And that would support my hypothesis perfectly:

The [polymorphic|http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2007/07/10/the-hole-in-the-middle-pattern/] and the [genus 1 manifold|http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Torus_3d.png] are both => so, a classic [Dooleyism|http://www.flickr.com/photos/baldheretic/322155483/].

Thank you also to Professor Billingham for pointing this out!

I think the thread can be closed now, or are there any further questions?

Re: polymorphism

ThomasZloch — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:41:40 GMT

Bitte saldieren Sie dieses Einschraubgewinde.

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:47:47 GMT

hello ,

kindly reply only in english.

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:49:34 GMT

Excellent! I did a quick search and could not find any hits either.

Hmmm.. will look a bit harder and then either post the question, or consider whether in fact the question itself should be questioned.

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:49:36 GMT

Thomas,

Thomas wrote:

Bitte saldieren Sie dieses Einschraubgewinde.

are you crazy? i saw you often to advice others to follow rules of engagment what about you dude?I should say look your self first.For God grace one of the moderator is also belong into same thread he can see what happnning here?

this forum is not only for German.May be in future some other needed person is also can take some help from same.Am not sure how He/she can read Bitte saldieren Sie dieses Einschraubgewinde.

I hope you understand!

Amit.

Edited by: Amit Gujargoud on Jul 18, 2008 12:50 PM

Re: polymorphism

ThomasZloch — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:56:10 GMT

Fortunately, you are the master of polite English.

Unfortunately, you are not able or willing to distinguish funny nonsense from rule violations.

Greetings

Thomas

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:02:28 GMT

Thomas Wrote:

Fortunately, you are the master of polite English.
Unfortunately, you are not able or willing to distinguish funny nonsense from rule violations.
Happy Hunting

Fortunately: you are the master in updating the threads without information of updatation.

Unfortunately:Am sorry to say your not the master of polite English. "Happy Hunting"

Cheers

Re: polymorphism

ThomasZloch — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:27:33 GMT

Yes, I did regret typing that in the first place, that's why I changed right afterwards.

I think your contributions in this forum here are valuable, so the term was out of place.

I apologize in this specific matter.

Thomas

Re: polymorphism

Former Member — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:43:27 GMT

Thank you for the apologies.

We would not want to have a [mad scientists convention|http://www.thefenwicks.com/gallery/current/larson.jpg] here, and this is also mentioned in [the rules of polymorphism|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] .

Speaking of which... is the statement in rule number 1 correct?

Re: polymorphism

ThomasZloch — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:55:31 GMT

I have no clue!

Bitte = please

saldieren Sie = close

dieses = this

Einschraubgewinde = thread